Introduction:
There have been recent calls for the implementation of a novel language to facilitate global communication. In my opinion, though this would make for a more level playing field economically, it is impractical.

Body Paragraph 1:
Those who support an international language rely on its economic advantages. The salient argument is that it would remove barriers to success currently in place. English is close to a universal language at the moment and those born in English-speaking countries have a clear headstart while those from non-English countries, who cannot afford private instruction, begin life at a disadvantage. A new language would reset these disparities.

Body Paragraph 2:
However, creating a new global language is fraught with challenges. The primary issue is the sheer scale of implementation. Developing a universally accepted language would require unprecedented global cooperation and resources. Furthermore, the resistance from native speakers of existing languages would be formidable. Many would view the imposition of a new language as a threat to their cultural identity.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the idea of a universal language has its merits, the practical challenges make it an unlikely solution. Instead, efforts should be directed towards improving proficiency in existing global languages and fostering multilingualism to bridge communication gaps.